Re: [boost] Re: Re: is_nan

From: Joel de Guzman (djowel_at_[hidden])
Date: 2003-07-07 11:14:58

Fernando Cacciola <fernando_cacciola_at_[hidden]> wrote:
> Fernando Cacciola <fcacciola_at_[hidden]> wrote in message
> news:be780m$ts7$1_at_main.gmane.org...
>> 
>> Thanks to Gabriel we may have an is_nan() right now.
>> 
> Oops!
> It was Joel de Guzman who offered his is_nan() implementation.
> 
> Sorry Joel :-)

No problem. I thought Gaby also offered an implementation ahead of me.
So you guys are interested then? It would really be nice to have a
common boost implementation. I'll put it in the sandbox tomorrow.

-- 
Joel de Guzman
joel at boost-consulting.com
http://www.boost-consulting.com
http://spirit.sf.net