RE: [boost] Re: Draft of new Boost Software License

From: Glen Knowles (gknowles_at_[hidden])
Date: 2003-07-08 13:31:56

From: Alexander Terekhov [mailto:terekhov_at_[hidden]]
>David Abrahams wrote:
>>                                     Unless you are prepared to depart
>> from your usual "hint-dropping" style and explain why you think CPL is
>> better than what we're considering, I think it's probably going to
>> remain... wherever it is that droppings end up.
>
>Sorry, I really can't explain it better than
>http://www.ibm.com/developerworks/library/os-cplfaq.html

The Common Public License already has a section in the wiki and fails the
boost requirements as shown.
http://www.crystalclearsoftware.com/cgi-bin/boost_wiki/wiki.pl?Boost_License
/Common_Public_License

Glen