From: Alexander Terekhov (terekhov_at_[hidden])
Date: 2003-07-08 13:42:10
Glen Knowles wrote:
> The Common Public License already has a section in the wiki and fails
> the boost requirements as shown.
Yeah. That "review process" was really entertaining. Thanks for the
reminder. "Must be simple to read and understand" is rather subjective,
don't you think? As for "Must not require that the source code be
available for execution or other binary uses of the library"... well,
what's the problem? www.boost.org was pretty stable, thus far.
Boost list run by bdawes at acm.org, gregod at cs.rpi.edu, cpdaniel at pacbell.net, john at johnmaddock.co.uk