[boost] Re: Draft of new Boost Software License

From: Alexander Terekhov (terekhov_at_[hidden])
Date: 2003-07-08 13:42:10

Glen Knowles wrote:
[...]
> The Common Public License already has a section in the wiki and fails
> the boost requirements as shown.
> http://www.crystalclearsoftware.com/cgi-bin/boost_wiki/wiki.pl?Boost_License/Common_Public_License

Yeah. That "review process" was really entertaining. Thanks for the 
reminder. "Must be simple to read and understand" is rather subjective, 
don't you think? As for "Must not require that the source code be 
available for execution or other binary uses of the library"... well, 
what's the problem? www.boost.org was pretty stable, thus far.

regards,
alexander.