[boost] Re: Draft of new Boost Software License

From: Alexander Terekhov (terekhov_at_[hidden])
Date: 2003-07-08 15:34:58

Glen Knowles wrote:
[...]
> Now you're arguing that the boost license requirements should be
> changed in order to make them compatible with the CPL? That's a bit of
> a stretch, especially since I like the boost requirements as they are.

Frankly, I think that boost requirements make no sense. As an 
"individual" (poor one ;-) ), I'd rather go this way:

http://lists.boost.org/MailArchives/boost/msg36819.php
([boost] Re: boost vs. The Lawyers (non-technical))

http://lists.boost.org/MailArchives/boost/msg46093.php
([boost] Re: Legal issues and licensing -- again)

OTOH, from "commercial" (and "OSS community") POV, I'd go CPL.

regards,
alexander.