From: Alexander Terekhov (terekhov_at_[hidden])
Date: 2003-07-08 15:34:58
Glen Knowles wrote:
> Now you're arguing that the boost license requirements should be
> changed in order to make them compatible with the CPL? That's a bit of
> a stretch, especially since I like the boost requirements as they are.
Frankly, I think that boost requirements make no sense. As an
"individual" (poor one ;-) ), I'd rather go this way:
([boost] Re: boost vs. The Lawyers (non-technical))
([boost] Re: Legal issues and licensing -- again)
OTOH, from "commercial" (and "OSS community") POV, I'd go CPL.
Boost list run by bdawes at acm.org, gregod at cs.rpi.edu, cpdaniel at pacbell.net, john at johnmaddock.co.uk