From: Alexander Terekhov (terekhov_at_[hidden])
Date: 2003-07-08 15:17:24
David Abrahams wrote:
> > As for "Must not require that the source code be available for
> > execution or other binary uses of the library"... well, what's the
> > problem? www.boost.org was pretty stable, thus far.
> The problem is that we don't want to force companies to assume the
> risk that www.boost.org will stick around.
Companies will keep the code anyway. The requirement is:
"A Contributor may choose to distribute the Program in object code
form under its own license agreement, provided that:
iv) states that source code for the Program is available from such
Contributor, and informs licensees how to obtain it in a reasonable
manner on or through a medium customarily used for software exchange."
Boost list run by bdawes at acm.org, gregod at cs.rpi.edu, cpdaniel at pacbell.net, john at johnmaddock.co.uk