From: Jens Maurer (Jens.Maurer_at_[hidden])
Date: 2003-07-11 16:05:23
David Abrahams wrote:
> In what sense? If a C++ source file includes a header (even
> indirectly) and the header changes, the source file should be
> recompiled. No recompilation is neccessary just because an
> application links to a built library whose sources include a header
> file that changed.
That's right, I was misled by the fact that boost/iterator/*
was checked in on Monday, but I started to see regression test
failures only yesterday. Further investigation showed that
libraries include boost/iterator_adaptors.hpp, and that file
was changed to use boost/iterator/* only yesterday.
Sorry for the confusion.
Boost list run by bdawes at acm.org, gregod at cs.rpi.edu, cpdaniel at pacbell.net, john at johnmaddock.co.uk