Re: [boost] Re: New iterator adaptors and bjam builds

From: Jens Maurer (Jens.Maurer_at_[hidden])
Date: 2003-07-11 16:05:23

David Abrahams wrote:
> In what sense?  If a C++ source file includes a header (even
> indirectly) and the header changes, the source file should be
> recompiled.  No recompilation is neccessary just because an
> application links to a built library whose sources include a header
> file that changed.

That's right, I was misled by the fact that boost/iterator/*
was checked in on Monday, but I started to see regression test
failures only yesterday.  Further investigation showed that
libraries include boost/iterator_adaptors.hpp, and that file
was changed to use boost/iterator/* only yesterday.

Sorry for the confusion.

Jens Maurer