From: Daniel Frey (d.frey_at_[hidden])
Date: 2003-07-12 16:32:22
On Sat, 12 Jul 2003 20:54:26 +0200, Aleksey Gurtovoy wrote:
> Daniel Frey wrote:
>> I wonder if it's possible to distinguish regressions into "fail" and
>> "not supported", where the latter means that it fails and we
>> (currently?) can't make it work. This way it might be easier to find
>> regressions that are supposed to work but fail because of "accidents"
> See http://email@example.com/msg08641.html for
> the thread on this exact topic.
Great! I think this will be the reference for new releases. :)
Boost list run by bdawes at acm.org, gregod at cs.rpi.edu, cpdaniel at pacbell.net, john at johnmaddock.co.uk