From: Beman Dawes (bdawes_at_[hidden])
Date: 2003-07-12 16:20:51
At 04:17 PM 7/12/2003, David Abrahams wrote:
>> A single-pass iterator is required to support r++ (inherited from the
>> incrementable iterator requirements), but I guess that we've
>> unintentionally dropped the requiremnt for *r++ of readable
>> single-pass iterator, by allowing incrementable iterators to return
>> any type convertible to const X&. I think it should require that the
>> return type be X, the Assertion/Note/Precondition/Postcondition column
>> should be labelled "Operational Semantics" and the lower right entry
>> should be moved to the middle column. The same goes for the
>> lower-right entry of each of the following two tables.
>> I'm going to make those changes; if there are objections, please let
>> me know ASAP.
In the main CVS? iterator-categories.html is still dated several days ago.
Or am I looking in the wrong place?
Boost list run by bdawes at acm.org, gregod at cs.rpi.edu, cpdaniel at pacbell.net, john at johnmaddock.co.uk