Re: [boost] Re: N1477 Single Pass Iterators and *r++

From: Beman Dawes (bdawes_at_[hidden])
Date: 2003-07-12 16:20:51

At 04:17 PM 7/12/2003, David Abrahams wrote:

 >> A single-pass iterator is required to support r++ (inherited from the
 >> incrementable iterator requirements), but I guess that we've
 >> unintentionally dropped the requiremnt for *r++ of readable
 >> single-pass iterator, by allowing incrementable iterators to return
 >> any type convertible to const X&.  I think it should require that the
 >> return type be X, the Assertion/Note/Precondition/Postcondition column
 >> should be labelled "Operational Semantics" and the lower right entry
 >> should be moved to the middle column.  The same goes for the
 >> lower-right entry of each of the following two tables.
 >>
 >> I'm going to make those changes; if there are objections, please let
 >> me know ASAP.
 >
 >Done.

In the main CVS? iterator-categories.html is still dated several days ago. 
Or am I looking in the wrong place?

--Beman