From: Kirill Lapshin (kir_at_[hidden])
Date: 2003-07-20 19:59:08
David Abrahams wrote:
> Ah, I understand. It seems as though the choices for linear algebra
> in C++ haven't improved much since I first started looking at them
> several years ago.
Right, and even blas implementation provided by uBlas seemed to be quite
far from good old C-style routines (e.g. ATLAS). Good news that there
are atlas bindings.
> Well, that's disturbing! http://tinyurl.com/hinz plainly says:
> Mailing lists
> uBLAS has no dedicated mailing list. Feel free to use the mailing
> lists of Boost .
> What's the address of the mailing list? 0_at_[hidden]? That's
> the only other thing I can find in your posting's header.
There is ublas-dev mail list on yahoo
(http://groups.yahoo.com/group/ublas-dev/). Unfortunetly it is not
available via gmane, and apparently my attempt to cross-post previous
message over there failed.
Boost list run by bdawes at acm.org, gregod at cs.rpi.edu, cpdaniel at pacbell.net, john at johnmaddock.co.uk