[boost] Re: Dangerous no_type-definition in signals_common.hpp

From: David Abrahams (dave_at_[hidden])
Date: 2003-07-21 09:45:13

Daniel Frey <daniel.frey_at_[hidden]> writes:

> Is there a reason for the code duplication? 

No.

> OK, it doesn't solve any problem/bug to use the type-traits-header,
> but OTOH not using the "boost-standard-header" for it communicates
> that there is a reason. To me, it's a kind of documentation
> fix. Admitted, a very small one :)

The use of char[8] in the type_traits header serves as a kind of
"anti-documentation", IMO.  But, as I've said, "whatever" ;-)

-- 
Dave Abrahams
Boost Consulting
www.boost-consulting.com