Re: [boost] Changes with new release

From: Ben Woodhead (zander_at_[hidden])
Date: 2003-07-21 09:59:53

Hello

An automated tool is nice but i personally think that it does not take much
additional time to add a quick list to the changelog once a patch has been
excepted. Infact, if I understand everything correctly, boost requires that
features be approved so its already been wrote out and its just a matter of
some light editing (or removing) and you should be able to cut and past it
into the cvs Changelog file.

Ben
----- Original Message ----- 
From: "Peter Dimov" <pdimov_at_[hidden]>
To: "Boost mailing list" <boost_at_[hidden]>
Sent: Saturday, July 19, 2003 12:51 PM
Subject: Re: [boost] Changes with new release

> Edward Diener wrote:
> > Once again I will make my request that Boost library developers put
> > out some sort of change log explaining changes made to the library
> > with each new release of Boost which is issued. While I don't expect
> > detailed change enumerations, which no doubt can be retrieved through
> > CVS in some way, a general explanation of the changes made would be
> > enormously helpful to end users and 3rd developers who use Boost
> > libraries.
>
> I like the idea in principle, but perhaps we should use an automated tool
> like
>
>   http://www.red-bean.com/cvs2cl/
>
> to produce the change log?
>
> _______________________________________________
> Unsubscribe & other changes:
http://lists.boost.org/mailman/listinfo.cgi/boost
>