From: David Abrahams (dave_at_[hidden])
Date: 2003-07-29 20:12:54
Matthias Troyer <troyer_at_[hidden]> writes:
> The third patch (patch3) is a workaround for operators.hpp, since the
> Boost PP library does not seem to work on the IBM. Is the preprocessor
> library really needed for that name mangling:
> #define BOOST_OPERATOR2_LEFT(name)
> or couldn't the simple
> #define BOOST_OPERATOR2_LEFT(name) name##2_left
> be used which would make Boost more portable? If there are reasons why
> the PP version is preferred? If there is a reason for the PP version
> then could someone please apply the patch with the workaround?
Daniel, I also had to apply massive patching to accessibility in
bool_testable. It fails on so many compilers that I begin to have
doubts that making it private is legal. Could you check, please?
-- Dave Abrahams Boost Consulting www.boost-consulting.com