From: Philippe A. Bouchard (philippe_at_[hidden])
Date: 2003-08-03 20:40:49
>> - "boost_gui_test/dialog.cpp" is pretty cool... I like it for its
>> simplicity but the syntax could be even more elegant. Try some
>> operator << instead
>> a macro defined number of parameters. Nobody likes this idea.
> Probably true, I think I was just looking for an excuse to try the
> preprocessor library :)
Or an array of rows defined a compile-time, a list or rows at run-time, etc.
>> - Work on the macro defined WxWindows signal / slot mechanism; this
>> is ugly. Maybe the suggestions I've sent to Mr. Slettebo could help.
> I'll have to look into that. Most of the signal/slot stuff I do (if
> I get your intention correctly) relies on boost::function<>.
Find a way not to rely on "official macros". Those are false hopes.
Boost list run by bdawes at acm.org, gregod at cs.rpi.edu, cpdaniel at pacbell.net, john at johnmaddock.co.uk