Boost logo

Boost :

From: Philippe A. Bouchard (philippe_at_[hidden])
Date: 2003-08-03 20:40:49

brock wrote:


>> - "boost_gui_test/dialog.cpp" is pretty cool... I like it for its
>> simplicity but the syntax could be even more elegant. Try some
>> operator << instead
> of
>> a macro defined number of parameters. Nobody likes this idea.
> Probably true, I think I was just looking for an excuse to try the
> preprocessor library :)

Or an array of rows defined a compile-time, a list or rows at run-time, etc.

>> - Work on the macro defined WxWindows signal / slot mechanism; this
>> is ugly. Maybe the suggestions I've sent to Mr. Slettebo could help.
> I'll have to look into that. Most of the signal/slot stuff I do (if
> I get your intention correctly) relies on boost::function<>.

Find a way not to rely on "official macros". Those are false hopes.


Boost list run by bdawes at, gregod at, cpdaniel at, john at