[boost] Re: the boost::signal sample crashes

From: Russell Hind (rhind_at_[hidden])
Date: 2003-08-06 08:42:59

This is just what I would like to see in boost.  I have created a 
duplicate set of headers for boost (same names, same structure but in 
boost_wrappers which do this and include the original header between the 
push and pop).  We had a discussion about this a while back and I am all 
for it, but people seemed against it.  I'll try and find a link to the 
discussion.

Thanks

Russell

John Maddock wrote:
>>Does regex address the issue of alignment and calling convention etc and
>>other options (in BCB, treat enums as ints is a good one to screw up
>>libraries) by wrapping the headers in push/pop option statements?
> 
> 
> Yes:
> 
> #ifdef __BORLANDC__
> #  pragma option push -a8 -b -Vx -Ve -pc -w-8027
> #endif
> 
> // code here....
> 
> #ifdef __BORLANDC__
> #  pragma option pop
> #endif
> 
> We should standardize this boost-wide really in some kind of prefix/suffix
> header.
> 
> John.
> 
> 
> _______________________________________________
> Unsubscribe & other changes: http://lists.boost.org/mailman/listinfo.cgi/boost
>