Re: [boost] Fun PP lib example

From: Peter Dimov (pdimov_at_[hidden])
Date: 2003-08-06 08:32:28

Aleksey Gurtovoy wrote:
> 
> There is another variation of the idiom, sometimes called "hidden
> state", which doesn't have the shortcoming in the first place:
> 
>     class foo
>     {
>      public:
>         foo();
>         foo(int);
> 
>         int f() const;
>         void g(double*);
> 
>      private:
>         struct state;
>         scoped_ptr<state> m_state;
>     };

Missing ~foo, possible undefined behavior. :-)