[boost] Re: the boost::signal sample crashes

From: Russell Hind (rhind_at_[hidden])
Date: 2003-08-06 11:53:26

Beman Dawes wrote:
> 
> I don't think people were against the idea of solving the problem, but 
> rather there is a need for a unified prefix/suffix header solution such 
> as John is suggesting. Developers need a "canned" solution; they can't 
> be asked to code #ifdefs and pragmas for compilers they know nothing about.
> 

I thought people were against it for reasons of setting up test cases 
and such, not because of the implementation.

At the time, I assumed it would be a pre-header and post-header for each 
compiler supported under boost.  In that case, it would be good thing to 
get in for the 1.31.0 release if possible.  I can supply the options for 
Borland but not other compilers.

Thanks

Russell