Re: [boost] Re: the boost::signal sample crashes

From: Beman Dawes (bdawes_at_[hidden])
Date: 2003-08-06 19:05:38

At 12:53 PM 8/6/2003, Russell Hind wrote:

 >Beman Dawes wrote:
 >>
 >> I don't think people were against the idea of solving the problem, but
 >> rather there is a need for a unified prefix/suffix header solution such 

 >> as John is suggesting. Developers need a "canned" solution; they can't
 >> be asked to code #ifdefs and pragmas for compilers they know nothing
 >about.
 >>
 >
 >I thought people were against it for reasons of setting up test cases
 >and such, not because of the implementation.

Well, some of us are trying to get out of doing additional work:-)

 >At the time, I assumed it would be a pre-header and post-header for each
 >compiler supported under boost.  In that case, it would be good thing to
 >get in for the 1.31.0 release if possible.  I can supply the options for
 >Borland but not other compilers.

Perhaps coordinate with John Maddock? He is really our config header 
expert.

--Beman