From: Martin Wille (mw8329_at_[hidden])
Date: 2003-08-07 15:25:47
David Abrahams wrote:
> It appears that the tagging step for Version_1_30_1 got messed up
> Please have a look at RC_1_30_2, which is our release candidate for
> Version 1_30_2, and let me know if there are any problems.
I'm not able to run the Linux regression tests on that branch.
process_jam_log fails due to an out_of_range being thrown from
basic_string::substr. Probably, some files are still missing for
the tests to work properly. The same is true for the 1.30.1 release.
I'll try to investigate that tomorrow.
Boost list run by bdawes at acm.org, gregod at cs.rpi.edu, cpdaniel at pacbell.net, john at johnmaddock.co.uk