Re: [boost] Re: Boost 1.31 release?

From: gmelquio_at_[hidden]
Date: 2003-08-12 00:29:29

En réponse à David Abrahams <dave_at_[hidden]>:

> Martin Wille <mw8329_at_[hidden]> writes:
> 
> > David Abrahams wrote:
> >
> >> In that case, can I release 1.30.2?  I don't like having the 1.30.1
> >> debacle hanging over my head.
> >
> >
> > There are new regressions on Linux (RC_1_30_0 branch):
> >
http://boost.sourceforge.net/regression-logs/cs-Linux-rc-1_30_0/developer_summary_page.html
> >
> >
> > crc has regressions for gcc-3.1 and gcc-3.2.3
> > config, format and io have regressions for intel 7.1
> 
> According to your chart, the following libraries are all regressing:

[...]
>   numeric/interval
[...]

Nothing has been commited to the RC_1_30_0 branch for the interval library, so
there should be no regression. In fact, the "regression" you speak about happens
with gcc-3.4-cvs. Martin was careful not to mention these failures in his mail.

> Are these real regressions or just newly-tested compilers?  Can the
> library authors/maintainers address these problems?  Where is our
> maintenance wizard?

Mainly newly-tested compilers (gcc-3.3.1 and gcc-3.4). You just have to focus on
gcc-3.1, gcc-3.2.3 and intel-7.1 columns.

Regards,

Guillaume