From: David Abrahams (dave_at_[hidden])
Date: 2003-08-12 08:57:07
Aleksey Gurtovoy <agurtovoy_at_[hidden]> writes:
> David Abrahams wrote:
>> Matthias Troyer <troyer_at_[hidden]> writes:
>> > Dear Boosters,
>> > Since some of the applications and libraries we plan on releasing soon
>> > rely on Boost features and bugfixes that are in the CVS but not in
>> > Boost 1.30. I wonder what the plans are for the Boost 1.31.0
>> > release? Since we would prefer to base our released software on a
>> > Boost release instead of a CVS snapshot I would be interested in
>> > hearing about the plans for a Boost 1.31 release
>> As far as I know the CVS is in very good health at the moment.
> Uhmm, I really wouldn't say so! If you look at the main trunk report -
> there are lots of regressions comparing to 1.30.0, and IMO we ought to fix
> all these before we branch for the release or anything.
There's got to be something wrong with the program that's making
these tables. Look, for example, at
It says that lambda_test is a regression on msvc. Everyone knows
that lambda has never worked on msvc (right?).
-- Dave Abrahams Boost Consulting www.boost-consulting.com
Boost list run by bdawes at acm.org, gregod at cs.rpi.edu, cpdaniel at pacbell.net, john at johnmaddock.co.uk