From: Eric Friedman (ebf_at_[hidden])
Date: 2003-08-12 14:34:37
John Maddock wrote:
> Everything in suffix.hpp is generic macro workarounds - it's not dependent
> upon specific compilers just whether the appropriate macro is defined.
> I think you are going to have to use a dirty workaround here: check for
> before using BOOST_EXPLICIT_TEMPLATE_TYPE(void)
> in this particular case.
I've added BOOST_EXPLICIT_TEMPLATE_TYPE_SPEC (and so on) helper macros to
suffix.hpp to address this situation. They declare a pointer but without a
Boost list run by bdawes at acm.org, gregod at cs.rpi.edu, cpdaniel at pacbell.net, john at johnmaddock.co.uk