From: Fernando Cacciola (fernando_cacciola_at_[hidden])
Date: 2003-08-14 15:24:01
David Abrahams <dave_at_[hidden]> wrote in message
> "Fernando Cacciola" <fernando_cacciola_at_[hidden]> writes:
> > The page is: http://boost.sourceforge.net/regression-logs/cs-Linux.html
> > So it should correspond to the HEAD revision.
> > IIUC, the HEAD revision contains Jen's broken patch, so this one should fail.
> I am only concerned with RC_1_30_0 here.
> > I think that the correct patch is to revert Jens' fix.
> > (go back to revision 1.9).
> > Can you and others run a quick test to see if this fix is correct?
> RC_1_30_0 already works with GCC-3.2 work for me.
I wonder what would happen with gcc3.3 and 3.3.1 without Jen's patch.
Should I revert that anyway, even if it leaves those compilers unsupported?
> I checked in this
> patch to fix vc6/7:
Boost list run by bdawes at acm.org, gregod at cs.rpi.edu, cpdaniel at pacbell.net, john at johnmaddock.co.uk