[boost] Re: Release of 1.30.2 imminent

From: David Abrahams (dave_at_[hidden])
Date: 2003-08-14 22:11:49

"Fernando Cacciola" <fernando_cacciola_at_[hidden]> writes:

> David Abrahams <dave_at_[hidden]> wrote in message
> news:uekzooxw3.fsf_at_boost-consulting.com...
>> "Fernando Cacciola" <fernando_cacciola_at_[hidden]> writes:
>> > The page is: http://boost.sourceforge.net/regression-logs/cs-Linux.html
>> > So it should correspond to the HEAD revision.
>> > IIUC, the HEAD revision contains Jen's broken patch, so this one should fail.
>>
>> I am only concerned with RC_1_30_0 here.
>>
> I see.
>
>> > I think that the correct patch is to revert Jens' fix.
>> > (go back to revision 1.9).
>> >
>> > Can you and others run a quick test to see if this fix is correct?
>>
>> RC_1_30_0 already works with GCC-3.2 work for me.
>>
> I see.
> I wonder what would happen with gcc3.3 and 3.3.1 without Jen's patch.
> Should I revert that anyway, even if it leaves those compilers unsupported?

Are they healthier without the patch or with it?  Can you use
BOOST_WORKAROUND to select the best answer for all GCC versions?

-- 
Dave Abrahams
Boost Consulting
www.boost-consulting.com