From: Martin Wille (mw8329_at_[hidden])
Date: 2003-08-16 13:19:06
David Abrahams wrote:
> I believe I have now eliminated all the regressions in the RC_1_30_0
> branch, though recent test updates at
> http://tinyurl.com/k7vl and http://tinyurl.com/jtpd seem to
> contradict that. I find that very strange because I specifically
> reproduced those problems and addressed them on my machine, and the
> results *are* checked in to CVS. Unless the RC_1_30_0 tag has somehow
> magically been made non-sticky, or there's something wrong with the
> testers' CVS update procedure, I don't see how it's possible.
> Would testers for the 1.30.2 release please be sure they're updating
> to RC_1_30_0 and post new results?
Done. Unfortunately there are new regressions for
optional_test on gcc-2.95.3/Linux.
Boost list run by bdawes at acm.org, gregod at cs.rpi.edu, cpdaniel at pacbell.net, john at johnmaddock.co.uk