[boost] Re: 1.30.2 ready for release?

From: David Abrahams (dave_at_[hidden])
Date: 2003-08-16 13:48:40

Martin Wille <mw8329_at_[hidden]> writes:

> David Abrahams wrote:
>> I believe I have now eliminated all the regressions in the RC_1_30_0
>> branch, though recent test updates at
>> http://tinyurl.com/k7vl and http://tinyurl.com/jtpd seem to
>> contradict that.  I find that very strange because I specifically
>> reproduced those problems and addressed them on my machine, and the
>> results *are* checked in to CVS.  Unless the RC_1_30_0 tag has somehow
>> magically been made non-sticky, or there's something wrong with the
>> testers' CVS update procedure, I don't see how it's possible.
>> Would testers for the 1.30.2 release please be sure they're updating
>> to RC_1_30_0 and post new results?
>
> Done. Unfortunately there are new regressions for
> optional_test on gcc-2.95.3/Linux.

Okay, I fixed that one.  Nobody breathe... I'm going to tag it for release.

-- 
Dave Abrahams
Boost Consulting
www.boost-consulting.com