From: Peter Dimov (pdimov_at_[hidden])
Date: 2003-08-26 07:39:21
E. Gladyshev wrote:
> I guess my question is that, is boost redefining the
> memory management concepts that have been established by STL?
Yes and no. The STL uses allocators for containers. Most non-containers do
not have an allocator parameter, although many standard classes do allocate
Boost list run by bdawes at acm.org, gregod at cs.rpi.edu, cpdaniel at pacbell.net, john at johnmaddock.co.uk