Re: [boost] enable_if formal review ?

From: Thomas Witt (witt_at_[hidden])
Date: 2003-08-26 09:03:45

-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-----
Hash: SHA1

Jaako,

Jaakko Jarvi wrote:

| Hi Boosters,
|
| We submitted enable_if for formal review in July. The library does not
| seem to be on the review queue,

It is in fact in the queue, only that the queue is only current in CVS.

| and maybe it is not worth a full
| review.

Let's introduce a fasttrack review for this kind of utility components
criteria and procedure will be as follows.

What components qualify for a fasttrack review
- ---------------------------------------------

- - The technique must be already in use in boost libraries
~  thus the new component provides a common implementation

- - The component must be small

Procedure
- ---------

- - A full boost-conformant implementation is available in the sandbox

- - The submitter posts an fasttrack review announcement to the list
(should this go to boost-announce as well?). Review period should last
for 5 days. No two fasttrack review should run in parallel. Fasttrack
review may run during full reviews, though generally this should be avoided.

- - After the review period ended, the submitter will post a review
summary containing planned changes to the current implementation.

- - After applying all changes, the component will be checked in to cvs by
the submitter.

If nobody objects, I'll add this to our review policies.

Thomas

Boost Review Wizard.

- --
Dipl.-Ing. Thomas Witt
Institut fuer Verkehrswesen, Eisenbahnbau und -betrieb, Universitaet
Hannover
voice: [phone] - 4273, fax: [phone]
http://www.ive.uni-hannover.de
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
Version: GnuPG v1.2.1 (MingW32)
Comment: Using GnuPG with Thunderbird - http://enigmail.mozdev.org

iD8DBQE/S2jB0ds/gS3XsBoRAgE8AJ0fPp7LS8DBg40OrGrR+pa/bkXYfgCfednm
RUDdbbSxF1x1SFTXSDGjGvI=
=yjEu
-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----