From: David Abrahams (dave_at_[hidden])
Date: 2003-08-26 14:34:57
Thomas Witt <witt_at_[hidden]> writes:
> David Abrahams wrote:
>> Thomas Witt <witt_at_[hidden]> writes:
>>>- - A full boost-conformant implementation is available in the sandbox
>> Or in Boost CVS, I hope... since if it's already in use it may
>> already be there.
> I assume that in general the new component would have a new place and
> add some tweaks. Furthermore I would not want to make a general
> exception to the review-first-boost-CVS-then idea. That being said,
> something that is in boost CVS already doesn't need to be moved to
> sandbox for review purposes.
>>>- - The submitter posts an fasttrack review announcement to the list
>>>(should this go to boost-announce as well?). Review period should last
>>>for 5 days. No two fasttrack review should run in parallel. Fasttrack
>>>review may run during full reviews, though generally this should be avoided.
>> No review manager intervention at all?
> Yep this is going to be lightweight process. If it doesnt play out we
> can change it accordingly.
>> Hmm, I'd rather you make the
> I can check the preconditions and do the scheduling as well as the
> announcement, if you want me to.
That'd be great; I just think it shouldn't be up to one person alone
(usually the author of a component) to initiate a review. Someone
needs to be there to say "this isn't worthy/ready/small
enough/whatever" just in case.
-- Dave Abrahams Boost Consulting www.boost-consulting.com
Boost list run by bdawes at acm.org, gregod at cs.rpi.edu, cpdaniel at pacbell.net, john at johnmaddock.co.uk