From: David Abrahams (dave_at_[hidden])
Date: 2003-09-02 06:32:01
"E. Gladyshev" <egladysh_at_[hidden]> writes:
>> The class getting constructed/destroyed has full control over that or
>> the language is utterly bustificated.
> I think construct/destroy can be implemented as non-customizable
> static functions in boost just for convinence.
Just how do you propose to prevent people from writing their own
construct/destroy functions? And if they write an allocator from
scratch, but *don't* provide construct/destroy manually, where will
they come from?
-- Dave Abrahams Boost Consulting www.boost-consulting.com
Boost list run by bdawes at acm.org, gregod at cs.rpi.edu, cpdaniel at pacbell.net, john at johnmaddock.co.uk