From: David Abrahams (dave_at_[hidden])
Date: 2003-09-03 08:51:30
"Jeff Garland" <jeff_at_[hidden]> writes:
> On Tue, 02 Sep 2003 16:50:09 -0400, David Abrahams wrote
>> I'm just getting started with the date_time library, and I think I'm
>> gonna like it.
> Let's hope so!
>> I have some quibbles with the naming choices though
>> (shocking! me of all people!) For example, why is the nested
>> namespace called posix_time instead of, simply, posix? Once you're
> Seemed clearer to me that it would be limited to time and not presume to
> encompass all of posix.
>> in a date_time context it seems to me that _time adds nothing.
>> Similarly, what's the "p" in ptime stand for? I can guess, but I
>> can guess it's also redundant ;-)
> My first choice was 'time'. However, as I recall I ran into some nasty macros
> that interfered with that name, sigh. time_point would be another
> possibility, but it is longer. I'm certainly open to suggestions...
Disable the macros where neccessary? You can do it temporarily and
provide an alias typedef.
-- Dave Abrahams Boost Consulting www.boost-consulting.com
Boost list run by bdawes at acm.org, gregod at cs.rpi.edu, cpdaniel at pacbell.net, john at johnmaddock.co.uk