Re: [boost] date_time naming

From: Jeff Garland (jeff_at_[hidden])
Date: 2003-09-03 09:11:29

> > My first choice was 'time'.  However, as I recall I ran into some 
> > nasty macros that interfered with that name, sigh.  time_point would be 
> > another possibility, but it is longer.  I'm certainly open to suggestions...

> Disable the macros where neccessary?  You can do it temporarily and
> provide an alias typedef.

But what other code would that break if you disable the macro?  It's been so
long that I can't even remember which platform, but these seems like opening a
Can-O-Big-Worms....

Jeff