Re: [boost] BOOST TEST and strict /Za no lanugage extensions option - virturenot fully rewarded?

From: Ulrich Eckhardt (uli_at_[hidden])
Date: 2003-09-03 15:11:55

-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-----
Hash: SHA1

On Wednesday 03 September 2003 15:56, Paul A. Bristow wrote:
> #ifdef _MSC_VER // or BOOST_MSVC?
> #pragma warning (disable : 4511) // copy operator could not be generated
> #pragma warning (disable : 4512) // assignment operator could not be
> #endif // _MSC_VER

In this case, BOOST_MSVC is the right one, possibly with a version. The reason 
is that other (IMO thus broken) compilers also define that symbol ...
However, I seem to remember that that is documented. If not, I'm probably 
confusing this with STLport sources.

Uli
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
Version: GnuPG v1.2.2 (GNU/Linux)

iD8DBQE/VksSwVdGSYi8Mq8RAs7KAJ4xnOaAlDJwjf32LETGOK2AvqbqBwCdEOu/
QH/ZHMrAzWmpS5XWYf9g1SA=
=DDqA
-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----