From: Paul A. Bristow (boost_at_[hidden])
Date: 2003-09-04 08:58:39
But do the 'emulating' compilers also have the same pragma warning disable
Paul A Bristow, Prizet Farmhouse, Kendal, Cumbria, LA8 8AB UK
+44 1539 561830 Mobile +44 7714 33 02 04
| -----Original Message-----
| From: boost-bounces_at_[hidden]
| [mailto:boost-bounces_at_[hidden]]On Behalf Of Ulrich Eckhardt
| Sent: Wednesday, September 03, 2003 9:12 PM
| To: Boost mailing list
| Subject: Re: [boost] BOOST TEST and strict /Za no lanugage extensions
| option -virturenot fully rewarded?
| -----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-----
| Hash: SHA1
| On Wednesday 03 September 2003 15:56, Paul A. Bristow wrote:
| > #ifdef _MSC_VER // or BOOST_MSVC?
| > #pragma warning (disable : 4511) // copy operator could not be generated
| > #pragma warning (disable : 4512) // assignment operator could not be
| > #endif // _MSC_VER
| In this case, BOOST_MSVC is the right one, possibly with a version.
| The reason
| is that other (IMO thus broken) compilers also define that symbol ...
| However, I seem to remember that that is documented. If not, I'm probably
| confusing this with STLport sources.
Boost list run by bdawes at acm.org, gregod at cs.rpi.edu, cpdaniel at pacbell.net, john at johnmaddock.co.uk