|
|
Boost : |
From: Joel de Guzman (djowel_at_[hidden])
Date: 2003-09-05 12:07:18
Daniel Frey <daniel.frey_at_[hidden]> wrote:
> We could transfer it to the interface:
>
> 2003-Jan-1
Oh yes, That's supported with the ET that I sent to Jeff.
> Of course users should be aware of the binding of operator-, which might
> be a small problem, but IMHO it's better than 1/Jan/2003 or something
> which looks very strange to me. With '-' almost anyone will be reminded
> of the fact that this is not their local flavor of the date format.
Indeed.
-- Joel de Guzman http://www.boost-consulting.com http://spirit.sf.net
Boost list run by bdawes at acm.org, gregod at cs.rpi.edu, cpdaniel at pacbell.net, john at johnmaddock.co.uk