[boost] Re: License updates for 1.30.2

From: David Abrahams (dave_at_[hidden])
Date: 2003-09-15 10:42:37

"Peter Dimov" <pdimov_at_[hidden]> writes:

> Beman Dawes wrote:
>> 
>> Physically, that means editing all source files to reflect the new
>> license. Here is what the start of C++ source files should look like:
>> 
>> //  foo library header
>> 
>> //  Copyright Jane Programmer, 2003.
>> //  See accompanying license for terms and conditions of use.
>
> Shouldn't this be:
>
> // See Boost Software License Version 1.0 for terms and conditions of use.

I'm not sure if that's precisely the right answer, but I think it's on
the right track.  I *am* sure we haven't fully explored how references
to the detached license should work yet.

Do we also need a stable URL at which v1.0 of the license can be
found even after LICENSE is replaced with v2.0?

-- 
Dave Abrahams
Boost Consulting
www.boost-consulting.com