From: David Abrahams (dave_at_[hidden])
Date: 2003-09-15 10:42:37
"Peter Dimov" <pdimov_at_[hidden]> writes:
> Beman Dawes wrote:
>> Physically, that means editing all source files to reflect the new
>> license. Here is what the start of C++ source files should look like:
>> // foo library header
>> // Copyright Jane Programmer, 2003.
>> // See accompanying license for terms and conditions of use.
> Shouldn't this be:
> // See Boost Software License Version 1.0 for terms and conditions of use.
I'm not sure if that's precisely the right answer, but I think it's on
the right track. I *am* sure we haven't fully explored how references
to the detached license should work yet.
Do we also need a stable URL at which v1.0 of the license can be
found even after LICENSE is replaced with v2.0?
-- Dave Abrahams Boost Consulting www.boost-consulting.com
Boost list run by bdawes at acm.org, gregod at cs.rpi.edu, cpdaniel at pacbell.net, john at johnmaddock.co.uk