Boost logo

Boost :

From: David Abrahams (dave_at_[hidden])
Date: 2003-09-15 10:42:37

"Peter Dimov" <pdimov_at_[hidden]> writes:

> Beman Dawes wrote:
>> Physically, that means editing all source files to reflect the new
>> license. Here is what the start of C++ source files should look like:
>> // foo library header
>> // Copyright Jane Programmer, 2003.
>> // See accompanying license for terms and conditions of use.
> Shouldn't this be:
> // See Boost Software License Version 1.0 for terms and conditions of use.

I'm not sure if that's precisely the right answer, but I think it's on
the right track. I *am* sure we haven't fully explored how references
to the detached license should work yet.

Do we also need a stable URL at which v1.0 of the license can be
found even after LICENSE is replaced with v2.0?

Dave Abrahams
Boost Consulting

Boost list run by bdawes at, gregod at, cpdaniel at, john at