From: Paul A. Bristow (boost_at_[hidden])
Date: 2003-09-15 14:10:49
It is for this purpose that I suggested a Digital Object Identifer DOI.org
This provides an indirection.
But it is not a priority for now perhaps. And perhaps it is too expensive? Can
any academic institution provide it for free?
Paul A Bristow, Prizet Farmhouse, Kendal, Cumbria, LA8 8AB UK
+44 1539 561830 Mobile +44 7714 33 02 04
| -----Original Message-----
| From: boost-bounces_at_[hidden]
| [mailto:boost-bounces_at_[hidden]]On Behalf Of David Abrahams
| Sent: Monday, September 15, 2003 4:43 PM
| To: boost_at_[hidden]
| Subject: [boost] Re: License updates for 1.30.2
| "Peter Dimov" <pdimov_at_[hidden]> writes:
| > Beman Dawes wrote:
| >> Physically, that means editing all source files to reflect the new
| >> license. Here is what the start of C++ source files should look like:
| >> // foo library header
| >> // Copyright Jane Programmer, 2003.
| >> // See accompanying license for terms and conditions of use.
| > Shouldn't this be:
| > // See Boost Software License Version 1.0 for terms and conditions of use.
| I'm not sure if that's precisely the right answer, but I think it's on
| the right track. I *am* sure we haven't fully explored how references
| to the detached license should work yet.
| Do we also need a stable URL at which v1.0 of the license can be
| found even after LICENSE is replaced with v2.0?
| Dave Abrahams
| Boost Consulting
| Unsubscribe & other changes: http://lists.boost.org/mailman/listinfo.cgi/boost
Boost list run by bdawes at acm.org, gregod at cs.rpi.edu, cpdaniel at pacbell.net, john at johnmaddock.co.uk