From: Peter Dimov (pdimov_at_[hidden])
Date: 2003-09-16 07:27:08
Beman Dawes wrote:
> At 09:30 AM 9/15/2003, Peter Dimov wrote:
> > Shouldn't this be:
> > // See Boost Software License Version 1.0 for terms and conditions of
> That question came in discussions with the lawyers. The short answer
> was "no".
> I'm having trouble remember the full rationale, but gist of it was
> that there isn't a need to identify the version, since the license is
> included in the distribution.
OK, but if you are looking at the source file in isolation, how do you know
which distribution it came from?
Boost list run by bdawes at acm.org, gregod at cs.rpi.edu, cpdaniel at pacbell.net, john at johnmaddock.co.uk