Re: [boost] Re: Proposal for a new defect macro in Boost.Config

From: Peter Dimov (pdimov_at_[hidden])
Date: 2003-09-17 10:22:19

Joaquín Mª López Muñoz wrote:
> David Abrahams ha escrito:
>
>> BOOST_NO_POINTER_TO_MEMBER_TEMPLATE_ARGUMENTS
>>
>> This can only be misinterpreted by someone who doesn't know the
>> language terminology, it seems to me.
>>
>>
>
> There is IMHO a deviant interpretation of your proposed name, namely
> that POINTER_TO_MEMBER refers to a type instead of an non-type
> argument,
> like in:
>
> template<typename T> struct foo{...};
>
> foo<int A::*> f; // instantiated with a type

BOOST_NO_POINTER_TO_MEMBER_TEMPLATE_PARAMETERS, then. In this example, T is
the parameter, int A::* is the argument.