[boost] Re: License updates for 1.30.2

From: David Abrahams (dave_at_[hidden])
Date: 2003-09-18 15:29:12

"Smith, Devin" <DSMITH_at_[hidden]> writes:

> * I recommend the following:
>
>   - Use the following text to refer to the license:
>
>     Use, modification and distribution is subject to the Boost Software
> License Version 1.0.

      Use, modification and distribution is subject to Version 1.0 of
      the Boost Software License

sounds more natural.  Is that OK?

>   - Include a copy of each version of the Boost license in use by a
>     shipping library in the Boost distribution.  The version number
>     should be identifiable both from the license file's name and its
>     contents
>
>   - Optionally add a URL to *stable* license text, e.g.
>
>     Use, modification and distribution is subject to the Boost Software
> License Version 1.0 (http://boost.org/LICENSE-1.0).

OK, I guess the only other question is, do we want to include a URL?
Is there any advantage?

-- 
Dave Abrahams
Boost Consulting
www.boost-consulting.com