From: Peter Dimov (pdimov_at_[hidden])
Date: 2003-09-19 07:00:20
David Abrahams wrote:
> "Smith, Devin" <DSMITH_at_[hidden]> writes:
>> * I recommend the following:
>> - Use the following text to refer to the license:
>> Use, modification and distribution is subject to the Boost
>> Software License Version 1.0.
> Use, modification and distribution is subject to Version 1.0 of
> the Boost Software License
> sounds more natural. Is that OK?
FWIW, I like the original wording. I parse "Boost Software License Version
1.0" as the full name of the license.
Boost list run by bdawes at acm.org, gregod at cs.rpi.edu, cpdaniel at pacbell.net, john at johnmaddock.co.uk