Boost logo

Boost :

From: Jaakko Jarvi (jajarvi_at_[hidden])
Date: 2003-09-18 20:47:41

> I looked at your code. Portability seems fine. (I'm assuming there are no
> compilers supporting SFINAE but not partial specialization?)

> The license seems far more in-depth than most other Boost licenses. For such
> a simple library, might this be misguided? (That is, can it be provided
> under a simpler license?)

That's a standard open source license of our employer.
The license will change to standard Boost license soon
(some procdures that our employer obligates need to be done first).

> Aside from questions over the license, I think this should be accepted into
> Boost (IMO without a formal review).

It's easy to agree with this :)


Boost list run by bdawes at, gregod at, cpdaniel at, john at