From: David Abrahams (dave_at_[hidden])
Date: 2003-09-24 07:14:53
Please try to limit the size of your replies. There was no need to
include an entire copy of the original message below your reply.
"carlos pizano" <carlospizano_at_[hidden]> writes:
>>> For testing I think that the goal is not JIT debugging but log the
>>> & fail the test. Maybe stack unwinding is ok.
>> I think it's a big "maybe". Someone should prove why "log the error
>> and exit immediately" isn't a better answer,
> -----Original Message-----
> From: boost-bounces_at_[hidden]
> [mailto:boost-bounces_at_[hidden]] On Behalf Of David Abrahams
> Sent: Tuesday, September 23, 2003 4:49 AM
> To: boost_at_[hidden]
> Subject: [boost] Re: boost::execution_monitor impl under windows
> "carlos pizano" <carlospizano_at_[hidden]> writes:
>>> Could you, please, explain again what and how you propose to enhance.
>> Yes. I should. There are several issues that are intertwined.
>> First off, I think the answers to my original post have all been good.
>> As usual, quite cryptic.
-- Dave Abrahams Boost Consulting www.boost-consulting.com
Boost list run by bdawes at acm.org, gregod at cs.rpi.edu, cpdaniel at pacbell.net, john at johnmaddock.co.uk