Boost :

Date view	Thread view	Subject view	Author view

From: Rozental, Gennadiy (gennadiy.rozental_at_[hidden])
Date: 2003-10-01 12:26:47

Next message: David Abrahams: "[boost] Re: review request: container_traits"
Previous message: David Abrahams: "[boost] Re: [serialization] default-constructors (was Re[serialization]problem deserializing vectors)"
Next in thread: David Abrahams: "[boost] Re: shifted_ptr: why?"
Reply: David Abrahams: "[boost] Re: shifted_ptr: why?"

Hi,

I looked over this submission. Even though I have several issues with the
code and implementation, my main concern here is: why?

Why would we need another custom smart pointer component, while it could be
easily implemented using PBSP plus custom object generator?

Did I miss something?

As it stands my vote it to reject this submission. Later on it could be
implemented as specific PBSP policy.

Gennadiy.

Next message: David Abrahams: "[boost] Re: review request: container_traits"
Previous message: David Abrahams: "[boost] Re: [serialization] default-constructors (was Re[serialization]problem deserializing vectors)"
Next in thread: David Abrahams: "[boost] Re: shifted_ptr: why?"
Reply: David Abrahams: "[boost] Re: shifted_ptr: why?"

Date view	Thread view	Subject view	Author view

Boost list run by bdawes at acm.org, gregod at cs.rpi.edu, cpdaniel at pacbell.net, john at johnmaddock.co.uk