From: David Abrahams (dave_at_[hidden])
Date: 2003-10-01 12:50:25
"Rozental, Gennadiy" <gennadiy.rozental_at_[hidden]> writes:
> I looked over this submission. Even though I have several issues with the
> code and implementation, my main concern here is: why?
> Why would we need another custom smart pointer component, while it could be
> easily implemented using PBSP plus custom object generator?
Are you sure? IIUC, PBSP would be little help the interesting part of
this design. The smart pointer interface is the easy part.
> Did I miss something?
> As it stands my vote it to reject this submission. Later on it could be
> implemented as specific PBSP policy.
And that would make it acceptable?
-- Dave Abrahams Boost Consulting www.boost-consulting.com
Boost list run by bdawes at acm.org, gregod at cs.rpi.edu, cpdaniel at pacbell.net, john at johnmaddock.co.uk