RE: [boost] Re: Variant implementation change (was re: unions)finalsummary

From: E. Gladyshev (egladysh_at_[hidden])
Date: 2003-10-09 18:15:17

--- Brock Peabody <brock.peabody_at_[hidden]> wrote:
[...]
> We have two choices:
> 
> (1) People who need variants that can be singular can get them but they have
> to use the unusual and possibly confusing syntax of putting boost::empty as
> the first type.
> 
> (2) All variants can be singular.
> 
> Do you agree with that?
> 

I agree with that completely.

Eugene

__________________________________
Do you Yahoo!?
The New Yahoo! Shopping - with improved product search
http://shopping.yahoo.com