From: brock (brock.peabody_at_[hidden])
Date: 2003-10-09 19:04:19
----- Original Message -----
From: "E. Gladyshev" <egladysh_at_[hidden]>
To: "Boost mailing list" <boost_at_[hidden]>
Sent: Thursday, October 09, 2003 6:15 PM
Subject: RE: [boost] Re: Variant implementation change (was
> --- Brock Peabody <brock.peabody_at_[hidden]> wrote:
> > We have two choices:
> > (1) People who need variants that can be singular can get them but they
> > to use the unusual and possibly confusing syntax of putting boost::empty
> > the first type.
> > (2) All variants can be singular.
> > Do you agree with that?
> I agree with that completely.
Well, I may have been wrong :) What do you think of Rainer's solution?
(3) Variants are singular only after a failed assignment
Boost list run by bdawes at acm.org, gregod at cs.rpi.edu, cpdaniel at pacbell.net, john at johnmaddock.co.uk