[boost] Re: any interest in a foreach looping construct?

From: Eric Niebler (eric_at_[hidden])
Date: 2003-10-10 02:54:44

Thorsten Ottosen wrote:
> 
> I do think it should be called FOR_EACH because it's more like a new
> keyword. I can't imagine that will clash with anything.
> 

IMO we should stick to the Boost naming convention and keep the BOOST_ 
prefix. There is nothing stopping users from #define-ing it to something 
shorter if they choose, but it doesn't work the other way 'round.

-- 
Eric Niebler
Boost Consulting
www.boost-consulting.com