[boost] Re: Thoughts on partial_random_shuffle

From: David Abrahams (dave_at_[hidden])
Date: 2003-10-12 16:52:58

Ross MacGregor <ross__macgregor_at_[hidden]> writes:

> Paul, you are right. I should change the parameter names to (begin,
> shuffle_end, end). This matches the specification for partial sort and

I don't think so...

© ISO/IEC ISO/IEC 14882:1998(E)
25 Algorithms library 25 Algorithms library
// 25.3, sorting and related operations:
// 25.3.1, sorting:
template<class RandomAccessIterator>
void sort(RandomAccessIterator first, RandomAccessIterator last);
template<class RandomAccessIterator, class Compare>
void sort(RandomAccessIterator first, RandomAccessIterator last,
Compare comp);
template<class RandomAccessIterator>
void stable_sort(RandomAccessIterator first, RandomAccessIterator last);
template<class RandomAccessIterator, class Compare>
void stable_sort(RandomAccessIterator first, RandomAccessIterator last,
Compare comp);
template<class RandomAccessIterator>
void partial_sort(RandomAccessIterator first,
RandomAccessIterator middle,
RandomAccessIterator last);
template<class RandomAccessIterator, class Compare>
void partial_sort(RandomAccessIterator first,
RandomAccessIterator middle,
RandomAccessIterator last, Compare comp);
template<class InputIterator, class RandomAccessIterator>
RandomAccessIterator

-- 
Dave Abrahams
Boost Consulting
www.boost-consulting.com