From: Rob Stewart (stewart_at_[hidden])
Date: 2003-10-14 12:51:57
From: brangdon_at_[hidden] (Dave Harris)
> In-Reply-To: <00f201c39065$0d1da890$64646464_at_godzilla>
> joel_at_[hidden] (Joel de Guzman) wrote (abridged):
> > Now that VC7.1 is here, isn't it about time that we break free from the
> > chains (at least for new libraries in the horizon)?
> I think VC7.1 is a strong argument. At least, VC7.0 wasn't good enough for
> my employers but VC7.1 is. We hope to have ported by the end of the year.
> VC6.0's longevity may be ending at last.
We're in exactly the same boat, though we also maintain our code
base for Solaris (Forte 6u2 and gcc) and Linux (gcc). (Who
knows, we may actually get to gcc on Windows, too.)
With VC7.1, we might actually be able to start using Boost
libraries here at work.
-- Rob Stewart stewart_at_[hidden] Software Engineer http://www.sig.com Susquehanna International Group, LLP using std::disclaimer;
Boost list run by bdawes at acm.org, gregod at cs.rpi.edu, cpdaniel at pacbell.net, john at johnmaddock.co.uk