Boost logo

Boost :

From: Joel de Guzman (joel_at_[hidden])
Date: 2003-10-16 08:25:02

David Abrahams <dave_at_[hidden]> wrote:
> Joel de Guzman wrote:
>> It seems worthwhile to actually go for a library proposal. Do you guys think
>> that the utility is a good candidate for a fast-track review?
> I think one of the criteria is that it has to be in use by one or more
> Boost libraries already as an implementation detail. Is it, yet?

Spirit's Phoenix :-) Soon, I'll be releasing a new Phoenix version in anticipation
of an LL merger. I wouldn't mind if it went the longer, standard review process.
I guess my question should have been: is it worthwhile to go for a review
(writing docs and all)? Is there sufficient interest? It seems so, but I'd like to
ask anyway.


Joel de Guzman

Boost list run by bdawes at, gregod at, cpdaniel at, john at